Comments on: Is Mitt sustainable?

By: Mitt’s lies – part 1 « wrdforwrd

Mitt’s lies – part 1 « wrdforwrd — Wed, 17 Oct 2012 17:21:46 +0000

[...] This is 12 minutes of Mitt mendacity monitoring, from the first debate. A good followup to the Is Mitt sustainable blog item – yes he is sustainable — and might become president – if gets away with [...]

By: wrdforwrd

wrdforwrd — Tue, 09 Oct 2012 18:13:30 +0000

True that — but I fear that we are already seeing that he’s getting away with a sustained series of lies, flip-flops and mis-characterizations, which in effect make him sustainable in a very perverse and frightening way.

By: Kelly S.

Kelly S. — Tue, 09 Oct 2012 00:00:21 +0000

I don’t think we will know whether Mitt is sustainable until we see him govern. It’s a risk I’m not willing to take to find out.

By: silver account

silver account — Fri, 05 Oct 2012 06:49:02 +0000

To win the White House, Obama or Romney must capture at least 270 of the Electoral College’s 538 available votes. A CNN poll released last week showed Obama with a 9 percentage point margin over Romney among likely voters in the state, leading 49 percent to 40 percent.

By: Pricilla

Pricilla — Sun, 30 Sep 2012 13:53:51 +0000

Hi there, I found your website via Google while searching for a related topic, your web site came up, it looks good. I’ve bookmarked it in my google bookmarks.

By: klem

klem — Fri, 21 Sep 2012 11:28:04 +0000

The election aint over until the fat lady sings November 5th. Romney’s biggest financial backers haven’t even opened their wallets yet. Have faith.

cheers

By: Observer

Observer — Thu, 20 Sep 2012 21:17:24 +0000

You must be salivating in anticipation of the debates…. all the more so if you’re right that they are Romney’s last chance to save the election.

While Romney doesn’t practice verbal hara-kiri on the same scale as a Dan Quayle or a Rick Perry, the spectacle of the too-preppy, gaffe-prone and sometimes petulant dilettante facing off on TV against the cool-headed, cerebral, well-spoken and likeable commander-in-chief (those 4 being adjectives that even Obama’s harshest critics regularly credit him with) hints at the kind of rhetorical skills mismatch that liberals haven’t enjoyed since the Reagan vs Mondale debates in 1984. And this time the liberals are coming into the debates leading in the polls, instead of being 30 points behind.