wrdforwrd

green and sustainable business

Kicking coal’s ash

with one comment


Distracted and disturbed by oil rig explosions, massive oil spills, feckless oil companies and volcanic ash clouds? Speaking of ash, here’s some good news that maybe escaped the attention it deserves: The Environmental Protection Agency wants to regulate coal ash with new rules that will ensure the “safe disposal and management” of ash produced from coal-fired power plants.

Coal ash is known more formally as coal combustion residuals; it is the byproduct of coal combustion and is disposed in liquid form in large surface impoundments and in solid form at landfills.

The residuals contain contaminants such as mercury, cadmium and arsenic, which are associated with cancer and various other serious health effects. The EPA said its risk assessment and damage cases “demonstrate that, without proper protections, these contaminants can leach into groundwater and can migrate to drinking water sources, posing significant health public concerns.”

The agency’s proposed rules will require, for the first time, that protective controls such as liners and groundwater monitoring are in place at new landfills to protect groundwater and human health. Existing surface impoundments will also require liners, with strong incentives to close the impoundments and transition to safer landfills that store coal ash in dry form, EPA says. There are nearly 900 coal ash landfills and surface impoundments nationwide.

The regulations “will ensure stronger oversight of the structural integrity of impoundments in order to prevent accidents” like the one at Kingston, TN in 2008, EPA says. The proposal also will “promote environmentally safe and desirable forms of recycling coal ash, known as beneficial uses.”

The dangers associated with structurally unsafe coal ash impoundments came to national attention in 2008 when an impoundment holding disposed waste ash generated by the Tennessee Valley Authority broke open and created a massive spill in Kingston that covered millions of cubic yards of land and river. The spill displaced residents, required hundreds of millions of dollars in cleanup costs and caused widespread environmental damage. Shortly afterward EPA began monitoring the cleanup, as well as investigating the structural integrity of impoundments where ash waste is stored.

EPA’s resulting proposal calls for public comment on two approaches for addressing the risks of coal ash management under the nation’s primary law for regulating solid waste, the Resource Recovery and Conservation Act (RCRA). One option is drawn from authorities available under Subtitle C, which creates a comprehensive program of federally enforceable requirements for waste management and disposal. The other option includes remedies under Subtitle D, which gives EPA authority to set performance standards for waste management facilities and would be enforced primarily through citizen suits. A chart comparing and contrasting the two approaches is available on EPA’s Web site.

Under each proposed approach EPA would leave in place the so-called Bevill exemption for beneficial uses of coal ash in which coal combustion residuals are recycled as components of products instead of placed in impoundments or landfills. Large quantities of coal ash are used in concrete, cement, wallboard and other contained applications that should not involve any exposure by the public to unsafe contaminants, EPA noted. These uses would not be impacted by the proposed rules. But the agency is seeking public comment on how to frame the continued exemption, and is focusing in particular on whether the exemption should exclude certain non-contained applications where contaminants in coal ash could pose risks to human health.

Here’s the official quotes from the officials:

“The time has come for common-sense national protections to ensure the safe disposal of coal ash,” said EPA Administrator Lisa P. Jackson. “We’re proposing strong steps to address the serious risk of groundwater contamination and threats to drinking water and we’re also putting in place stronger safeguards against structural failures of coal ash impoundments. The health and the environment of all communities must be protected.”

“EPA supports the legitimate beneficial use of coal combustion residuals,” said Mathy Stanislaus, assistant administrator for EPA’s Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, the agency office that will be responsible for implementing the proposals. “Environmentally sound beneficial uses of ash conserve resources, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, lessen the need for waste disposal units, and provide significant domestic economic benefits. This proposal will clearly differentiate these uses from coal ash disposal and assure that safe beneficial uses are not restricted and in fact are encouraged.”

Bookmark & Share

Advertisements

Written by William DiBenedetto

20 May, 2010 at 8:04 am

Posted in coal, environment, regulation

Tagged with , , ,

One Response

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Great post thx a lot !

    Percy Ripoll

    20 May, 2010 at 11:03 pm


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: